Results

In March 2026, following a 10-day trial in the Supreme Court Bronx County, Anthony Matturro along with his cocounsel secured a defense verdict on behalf of a property owner and a property manager. Plaintiff alleged that she suffered multiple level cervical herniations, need for knee and ankle surgery as well as exacerbation of preexisting injuries due to a ceiling collapse in her apartment. The jury verdict found that the defendants were not negligent in the maintenance of the apartment.

In July 2025 in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for a municipality. Plaintiff claimed that a road defect created a trap for his bicycle causing a fall from the bicycle. The unanimous jury verdict found that the alleged road defect was not a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's bicycle accident. 

In January 2024 following a 9-day trial in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Anthony Matturro secured a verdict in favor of an Occupational & Environmental Medical Practice. Plaintiff claimed that the medical practice was liable for the alleged negligent acts of its medical professional employee. A jury returned a verdict absolving the medical practice from any liability.

In February 2020 following a 6-day trial in the Supreme Court, Kings County, Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for his client in a medical practice case. Plaintiff contended that the medical practice and its podiatrist improperly performed an ankle tendon repair resulting in nerve damage.  They jury returned a unanimous verdict finding that the medical practice did not deviate from the standard of care and that the treatment provided was medically appropriate.

In October 2019 Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for his orthopedic surgeon client in the Supreme Court, Nassau County.  The plaintiff contended that following a displaced fracture of a hip the doctor did not properly perform an internal fixation open reduction surgery.  Plaintiff claimed a second surgery was needed along with a prolonged recovery.  Following a 5-day trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict finding that the orthopedic surgery did not deviate from the standard of care and the surgery was correctly performed.

After a four-week trial in the Supreme Court Nassau Count, Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for his clients neuroradiologists.  The plaintiff contended that the radiologists failed to properly describe and diagnose an intramedullary cyst in a then 49-year-old. Plaintiff claimed that she developed a dropped foot and irreversible spinal cord damage. The jury unanimously found that the physicians did not deviate from the standard of care and properly interpreted all radiographic studies in issue.