Results

In July 2025 in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for a municipality. Plaintiff claimed that a road defect created a trap for his bicycle causing a fall from the bicycle. The unanimous jury verdict found that the alleged road defect was not a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff's bicycle accident. 

In January 2024 following a 9-day trial in the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Anthony Matturro secured a verdict in favor of an Occupational & Environmental Medical Practice. Plaintiff claimed that the medical practice was liable for the alleged negligent acts of its medical professional employee. A jury returned a verdict absolving the medical practice from any liability.

In February 2020 following a 6-day trial in the Supreme Court, Kings County, Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for his client in a medical practice case. Plaintiff contended that the medical practice and its podiatrist improperly performed an ankle tendon repair resulting in nerve damage.  They jury returned a unanimous verdict finding that the medical practice did not deviate from the standard of care and that the treatment provided was medically appropriate.

In October 2019 Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for his orthopedic surgeon client in the Supreme Court, Nassau County.  The plaintiff contended that following a displaced fracture of a hip the doctor did not properly perform an internal fixation open reduction surgery.  Plaintiff claimed a second surgery was needed along with a prolonged recovery.  Following a 5-day trial, the jury returned a unanimous verdict finding that the orthopedic surgery did not deviate from the standard of care and the surgery was correctly performed.

After a four-week trial in the Supreme Court Nassau Count, Anthony Matturro secured a defense verdict for his clients neuroradiologists.  The plaintiff contended that the radiologists failed to properly describe and diagnose an intramedullary cyst in a then 49-year-old. Plaintiff claimed that she developed a dropped foot and irreversible spinal cord damage. The jury unanimously found that the physicians did not deviate from the standard of care and properly interpreted all radiographic studies in issue.